CHAIRMAN PULLEN TO APPEAR ON HARDBALL WITH CHRIS MATTHEWS AND SPECIAL REPORT WITH BRIT HUME TODAY
Tune into MSNBC today at 2:00PM local time and catch Chairman Pullen talk about the Senate's immigration bill with Chris Matthews. The show repeats at 4:00PM and 12:00AM. Then check out Special Report with Brit Hume on Fox News at 3:00PM and see another segment with Chairman Pullen on immigration reform.
http://www.mccainalert.com
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
congresss can't comprehend current immigration laws yet
congresss can't comprehend current immigration laws yet they want to add 300 more pages ?
public opinoin of congress is lower the Bushes, that's hitting bottom.
www.mccainalert.com
public opinoin of congress is lower the Bushes, that's hitting bottom.
www.mccainalert.com
McCain takes a cheap shot at Romney
McCain takes a cheap shot at Romney
McCain vs. Romney
The New York Sun's Ryan Sager just asked McCain to comment on Mitt Romney's
public criticism of the immigration compromise. McCain responded, "Maybe I
should wait a couple of weeks and see if [his position] changes."
McCain then got in a one-two punch that hit both
Romney's
title="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,264026,00.html">alleged
exaggerations about his hunting experience and his employment of
immigrants for landscaping work: "Maybe he'll get out his small varmint gun
and drive those Guatemalans off his lawn."
www.mccainalert.com
McCain vs. Romney
The New York Sun's Ryan Sager just asked McCain to comment on Mitt Romney's
public criticism of the immigration compromise. McCain responded, "Maybe I
should wait a couple of weeks and see if [his position] changes."
McCain then got in a one-two punch that hit both
Romney's
title="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,264026,00.html">alleged
exaggerations about his hunting experience and his employment of
immigrants for landscaping work: "Maybe he'll get out his small varmint gun
and drive those Guatemalans off his lawn."
www.mccainalert.com
Lawmaker wants McCain to resign Senate seat over missed votes
Arizona Lawmaker wants McCain to resign Senate seat over missed votes
May 22, 2007
Arizona - Republican state Representative Russell Pearce in Arizona
wants U.S. Sen. John McCain to show up for votes while running
for president or quit his day job.
May 22, 2007
Arizona - Republican state Representative Russell Pearce in Arizona
wants U.S. Sen. John McCain to show up for votes while running
for president or quit his day job.
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Senator McCain, his campaign slumping, still backs Bush
Senator McCain, his campaign slumping, still backs Bush
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate
John McCain (news, bio, voting record), a one-time favorite
trying to shore up his slumping campaign, defended his support
for the unpopular Iraq war on Wednesday and accused
Democrats of putting politics ahead of U.S. security.
McCain said Democratic proposals for withdrawal timetables in Iraq
were cynical calculations that would create chaos in the Middle East
and said the new military strategy by President George W. Bush
and the new U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus,
needed time to succeed.
"We who are willing to support this new strategy, and give General
Petraeus the time and support he needs, have chosen a hard road,
but it is the right road. It is necessary and just," the Arizona
senator said in a speech at the Virginia Military Institute in
Lexington, Virginia.
"Let's put aside for a moment the small politics of the day. The judgment
of history should be the approval we seek, not the temporary favor of
the latest public opinion poll," said McCain, 70, who has slumped in
recent polls.
McCain has staked his campaign on the success of Bush's strategy of
building up forces in Baghdad to restore security in the city and
eventually allow an easing of the sectarian conflict and economic
recovery.
The speech at the conservative military institution in Virginia was
the first of three planned ahead of the formal launch of his White
House campaign at the end of April.
McCain's chief opponents for the Republican nomination, former
New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and former Massachusetts Gov.
Mitt Romney, also support Bush's new strategy in Iraq.
But McCain, a former prisoner of war in Vietnam, has been the most
outspoken supporter in Congress of the war and has become closely
linked with Bush's policy. He said the new course was "making progress," but cautioned about being too rosy about Iraq's future.
"We have a long way to go, but for the first time in four years,
we have a strategy that deals with how things really are in Iraq
and not how we wish them to be," he said.
Democrats fired back after the speech. Presidential contender Barack
Obama (news, bio, voting record), a senator from Illinois, renewed
his call for a change in strategy and "a responsible end to this war."
'IDEOLOGICAL FANTASIES'
"Progress in Iraq cannot be measured by the same ideological fantasies
that got us into this war," Obama said of McCain's speech.
Democratic White House contender John Edwards said "the people
playing politics with Iraq are Senator McCain and President Bush,
and they should be ashamed of themselves."
McCain said a quick retreat in Iraq would endanger the Middle East and
embolden terrorists, and he criticized Democrats in Congress for
trying to attach withdrawal timetables to a bill to fund the war.
"It may appear to be the easier course of action but it is a much
more reckless one, and it earns them no credit even if it gives
them an advantage in the next election," he said.
McCain has struggled to recapture the magic of his maverick but
ultimately losing presidential bid in 2000, when he won the
New Hampshire primary but fell to Bush in a bitter nomination battle.
After entering the 2008 race as an early favorite, McCain has slumped
in the polls as the war has grown more unpopular. He fell to third
among Republicans in fund raising in the first three months of the year.
He was forced to back away earlier this week from upbeat comments he
made about the country's security after a recent visit to Baghdad,
where he traveled under heavy military protection.
see more at http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070411/pl_nm/usa_politics_mccain_dc;_ylt=All4ClgCVe5xuUo7e19y0keyFz4D
Iraq plan By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent
Wed Apr 11, 3:58 PM ET
www.mccainalert.com
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate
John McCain (news, bio, voting record), a one-time favorite
trying to shore up his slumping campaign, defended his support
for the unpopular Iraq war on Wednesday and accused
Democrats of putting politics ahead of U.S. security.
McCain said Democratic proposals for withdrawal timetables in Iraq
were cynical calculations that would create chaos in the Middle East
and said the new military strategy by President George W. Bush
and the new U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus,
needed time to succeed.
"We who are willing to support this new strategy, and give General
Petraeus the time and support he needs, have chosen a hard road,
but it is the right road. It is necessary and just," the Arizona
senator said in a speech at the Virginia Military Institute in
Lexington, Virginia.
"Let's put aside for a moment the small politics of the day. The judgment
of history should be the approval we seek, not the temporary favor of
the latest public opinion poll," said McCain, 70, who has slumped in
recent polls.
McCain has staked his campaign on the success of Bush's strategy of
building up forces in Baghdad to restore security in the city and
eventually allow an easing of the sectarian conflict and economic
recovery.
The speech at the conservative military institution in Virginia was
the first of three planned ahead of the formal launch of his White
House campaign at the end of April.
McCain's chief opponents for the Republican nomination, former
New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and former Massachusetts Gov.
Mitt Romney, also support Bush's new strategy in Iraq.
But McCain, a former prisoner of war in Vietnam, has been the most
outspoken supporter in Congress of the war and has become closely
linked with Bush's policy. He said the new course was "making progress," but cautioned about being too rosy about Iraq's future.
"We have a long way to go, but for the first time in four years,
we have a strategy that deals with how things really are in Iraq
and not how we wish them to be," he said.
Democrats fired back after the speech. Presidential contender Barack
Obama (news, bio, voting record), a senator from Illinois, renewed
his call for a change in strategy and "a responsible end to this war."
'IDEOLOGICAL FANTASIES'
"Progress in Iraq cannot be measured by the same ideological fantasies
that got us into this war," Obama said of McCain's speech.
Democratic White House contender John Edwards said "the people
playing politics with Iraq are Senator McCain and President Bush,
and they should be ashamed of themselves."
McCain said a quick retreat in Iraq would endanger the Middle East and
embolden terrorists, and he criticized Democrats in Congress for
trying to attach withdrawal timetables to a bill to fund the war.
"It may appear to be the easier course of action but it is a much
more reckless one, and it earns them no credit even if it gives
them an advantage in the next election," he said.
McCain has struggled to recapture the magic of his maverick but
ultimately losing presidential bid in 2000, when he won the
New Hampshire primary but fell to Bush in a bitter nomination battle.
After entering the 2008 race as an early favorite, McCain has slumped
in the polls as the war has grown more unpopular. He fell to third
among Republicans in fund raising in the first three months of the year.
He was forced to back away earlier this week from upbeat comments he
made about the country's security after a recent visit to Baghdad,
where he traveled under heavy military protection.
see more at http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070411/pl_nm/usa_politics_mccain_dc;_ylt=All4ClgCVe5xuUo7e19y0keyFz4D
Iraq plan By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent
Wed Apr 11, 3:58 PM ET
www.mccainalert.com
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
Hannity starts a Iraq clock ticking on the Democrats on Fox news .
Hannity starts a Iraq clock ticking on the Democrats on Fox news .
lookd like everyone is waiting on the Democratic "new Direction in Iraq".
oh well, time will tell...................
www.mccainalert.com
lookd like everyone is waiting on the Democratic "new Direction in Iraq".
oh well, time will tell...................
www.mccainalert.com
Saturday, December 30, 2006
21st Century slaves ?
21st Century slaves ?
"If he succeeds, the transformation of the United States of America from a great nation into a cesspool of 21st Century slaves and their owners will mean the Bush mission is finally accomplished. Middle Class America will cease to exist..."
see more at...........
http://www.minutemanproject.com/
www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
"If he succeeds, the transformation of the United States of America from a great nation into a cesspool of 21st Century slaves and their owners will mean the Bush mission is finally accomplished. Middle Class America will cease to exist..."
see more at...........
http://www.minutemanproject.com/
www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
Democrats as wimps ?
Democrats as wimps ?
A Split Over War, the Wimp Thing, and How to Win
by Dick Polman
At a time when the Iraq war is draining President Bush's popularity, you might think that the Democrats would have a consensus plan of their own for ending the bloodshed and winning the peace.
But no such plan exists - because the party's liberal grassroots base and the cautious Washington establishment are too busy warring with each other.
The liberals, emboldened by growing antiwar sentiment in the polls, essentially want a timetable for pulling out the U.S. troops, but the centrists think that such a stance would enable Bush's spin team to once again paint the Democrats as national-security wimps.
Bush is politically vulnerable at the moment, but the fractious Democrats are ill-poised to take advantage. The liberal base is out of sync with the most visible contenders for the 2008 presidential nomination (Sens. Hillary Clinton, Evan Bayh, Joe Biden, and John Kerry), all of whom voted for Bush's war, none of whom have embraced the calls for troop withdrawal.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0822-09.htm
see more at www.mccainalert.com
A Split Over War, the Wimp Thing, and How to Win
by Dick Polman
At a time when the Iraq war is draining President Bush's popularity, you might think that the Democrats would have a consensus plan of their own for ending the bloodshed and winning the peace.
But no such plan exists - because the party's liberal grassroots base and the cautious Washington establishment are too busy warring with each other.
The liberals, emboldened by growing antiwar sentiment in the polls, essentially want a timetable for pulling out the U.S. troops, but the centrists think that such a stance would enable Bush's spin team to once again paint the Democrats as national-security wimps.
Bush is politically vulnerable at the moment, but the fractious Democrats are ill-poised to take advantage. The liberal base is out of sync with the most visible contenders for the 2008 presidential nomination (Sens. Hillary Clinton, Evan Bayh, Joe Biden, and John Kerry), all of whom voted for Bush's war, none of whom have embraced the calls for troop withdrawal.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0822-09.htm
see more at www.mccainalert.com
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
is Swift meatpacking "The Jungle" of 2006 ?
is Swift meatpacking "The Jungle" of 2006 ? Upton Sinclair famous book
of exploiting workers in the meatpacking industry.
more at www.mccainalert.com
of exploiting workers in the meatpacking industry.
more at www.mccainalert.com
Sunday, December 17, 2006
Gingrich hints at 2008 White House run
Gingrich hints at 2008 White House run
WASHINGTON - Newt Gingrich suggested on Sunday he might not run for president in 2008 if a rival has all but locked up the Republican nomination by next fall.
The former House speaker from Georgia said it would not be too late for him to enter the race after next Labor Day, if he believed no candidate had a clear advantage. He praised Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record) of Arizona and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani as the contenders to watch.
"If one of them seals it off by Labor Day, my announcing now wouldn't make any difference anyway," Gingrich said. "If none of the three, having from now 'til Labor Day, can seal it off, the first real vote is in 2008. And there's plenty of time in the age of television and e-mail, between Labor Day and 2008."
The nominee will not be picked officially until the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minn., in early September 2008.
Gingrich pointed out that John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan each waited to announce his candidacy until less than a year was left before the election. Kennedy confirmed he was running on Jan. 2, 1960; Reagan did so for the first time on Nov. 20, 1975, when he did not win the nomination, again on Nov. 13, 1979, and Jan. 29, 1984 when he did capture the White House.
"Of course I'm thinking about it," Gingrich said. "I hope between now and September, to help create with every candidate in both parties, a wave of new ideas, a wave of new solutions."
see more at........
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061217/ap_on_el_pr/white_house2008
.......
www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
WASHINGTON - Newt Gingrich suggested on Sunday he might not run for president in 2008 if a rival has all but locked up the Republican nomination by next fall.
The former House speaker from Georgia said it would not be too late for him to enter the race after next Labor Day, if he believed no candidate had a clear advantage. He praised Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record) of Arizona and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani as the contenders to watch.
"If one of them seals it off by Labor Day, my announcing now wouldn't make any difference anyway," Gingrich said. "If none of the three, having from now 'til Labor Day, can seal it off, the first real vote is in 2008. And there's plenty of time in the age of television and e-mail, between Labor Day and 2008."
The nominee will not be picked officially until the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minn., in early September 2008.
Gingrich pointed out that John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan each waited to announce his candidacy until less than a year was left before the election. Kennedy confirmed he was running on Jan. 2, 1960; Reagan did so for the first time on Nov. 20, 1975, when he did not win the nomination, again on Nov. 13, 1979, and Jan. 29, 1984 when he did capture the White House.
"Of course I'm thinking about it," Gingrich said. "I hope between now and September, to help create with every candidate in both parties, a wave of new ideas, a wave of new solutions."
see more at........
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061217/ap_on_el_pr/white_house2008
.......
www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
Friday, November 17, 2006
Mothers Against Illegal Aliens
http://www.mothersagainstillegalaliens.org/
Mothers Against Illegal Aliens CALL FOR ACTION to Congress of the United States of America.
MAIA orders the Congress of the United States of America without delay, to explicitly clarify in simple terms the 14th Amendment and bring into conformity the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment Section 1 of the United States Constitution. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment gives Congress the force to facilitate this order by the People of the United States of America.
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution clearly states: “All persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States” (emphasis added).
see more at the eb site
www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
Mothers Against Illegal Aliens CALL FOR ACTION to Congress of the United States of America.
MAIA orders the Congress of the United States of America without delay, to explicitly clarify in simple terms the 14th Amendment and bring into conformity the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment Section 1 of the United States Constitution. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment gives Congress the force to facilitate this order by the People of the United States of America.
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution clearly states: “All persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States” (emphasis added).
see more at the eb site
www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
Sunday, November 12, 2006
old fart, Senator Mccain wants another shot at the pres nomination?
old fart, Senator Mccain wants another shot at the pres nomination?
Arizona people would have voted him out of office
if he was up for re election in November,
not Senator Jon Kyl.
McCain may launch committee to explore a presidential bid
WASHINGTON - Days after the Republican Party's horrendous showing in the elections, speculation is building that Sen. John McCain is nearing a decision on running for
president in 2008.
The Arizona Republican is considered to be a leading
candidate for the GOP's nomination. But this week in
Phoenix, McCain was insisting that he still hadn't
decided on another White House bid.
Yet the senator and his advisers also have
consistently said in interviews with The Arizona
Republic over the past year that once the midterm
elections were over, he would begin the process of
seriously considering a run. advertisement
The latest such report came Friday when
unidentified sources close to McCain told the
Associated Press that a final decision likely
would not come until after the holidays.
McCain and about a half-dozen of his top aides,
huddled in Phoenix, have already decided to proceed
with the formation of a presidential exploratory
committee as early as next week, ABC News said.
An exploratory committee would enable McCain to
officially start raising money for a presidential
campaign.
A "draft McCain" effort was announced Thursday and
is expected to be formally launched in the next
few weeks in 15 states, including Arizona.
see more at
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1111mccain1111.html
more at www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
Arizona people would have voted him out of office
if he was up for re election in November,
not Senator Jon Kyl.
McCain may launch committee to explore a presidential bid
WASHINGTON - Days after the Republican Party's horrendous showing in the elections, speculation is building that Sen. John McCain is nearing a decision on running for
president in 2008.
The Arizona Republican is considered to be a leading
candidate for the GOP's nomination. But this week in
Phoenix, McCain was insisting that he still hadn't
decided on another White House bid.
Yet the senator and his advisers also have
consistently said in interviews with The Arizona
Republic over the past year that once the midterm
elections were over, he would begin the process of
seriously considering a run. advertisement
The latest such report came Friday when
unidentified sources close to McCain told the
Associated Press that a final decision likely
would not come until after the holidays.
McCain and about a half-dozen of his top aides,
huddled in Phoenix, have already decided to proceed
with the formation of a presidential exploratory
committee as early as next week, ABC News said.
An exploratory committee would enable McCain to
officially start raising money for a presidential
campaign.
A "draft McCain" effort was announced Thursday and
is expected to be formally launched in the next
few weeks in 15 states, including Arizona.
see more at
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1111mccain1111.html
more at www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
Friday, November 10, 2006
Did the President sandbag the GOP?
DEMOCRAT MAJORITY WILL PUSH BUSH AMNESTY
Did the President sandbag the GOP?
Los Angeles, CA - Why did President George W. Bush wait until after the mid-term elections to replace Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld? Why was there virtually no support from the White House for Republican candidates like Randy Graf and J.D. Hayworth in Arizona?
Most pundits agree that if Rumsfeld was to be replaced, it would have been much better for Republicans had the announcement been made before the elections. And with the razor-thin losses of key Republican candidates to supposedly "conservative" Democrats, it seems clear that a little more money or other support from the President or national GOP headquarters might have kept the House and Senate from turning over to Democrat control.
"Here you have conservative candidates and some incumbents who were solidly in favor of protecting our borders - a position with which the overwhelming American majority agrees," commented Minuteman Founder Jim Gilchrist. "Bush has been unable to pass his amnesty program through the GOP-controlled Congress, but he won't give up, so why wouldn't he welcome a more compliant Democrat-led pro-illegal alien Congress, where he wouldn't have effective opposition from his own party?"
Today's speech by the President tends to confirm Gilchrist's ruminations. When asked about the prospect of the Democrats cooperating with his amnesty proposals, Bush seemed almost delighted with the change of House leadership. Americans who question the open borders policies of this and previous administrations will have plenty to worry about in the coming months, if Gilchrist's analysis proves accurate.
"This is a devastating blow to the security of the country," said Gilchrist. "Every American is at greater risk than before the elections. Illegal aliens and terrorists are celebrating today, but our mission remains clear: we shall continue our surveillance and reporting operations in a continuing effort to inform and mobilize Americans to demand better border security."
###
SOURCE: MinutemanProject.com
The Minuteman Project
P.O. Box 3944
Laguna Hills, California 92654
MccainAlert
MccainAlert
Did the President sandbag the GOP?
Los Angeles, CA - Why did President George W. Bush wait until after the mid-term elections to replace Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld? Why was there virtually no support from the White House for Republican candidates like Randy Graf and J.D. Hayworth in Arizona?
Most pundits agree that if Rumsfeld was to be replaced, it would have been much better for Republicans had the announcement been made before the elections. And with the razor-thin losses of key Republican candidates to supposedly "conservative" Democrats, it seems clear that a little more money or other support from the President or national GOP headquarters might have kept the House and Senate from turning over to Democrat control.
"Here you have conservative candidates and some incumbents who were solidly in favor of protecting our borders - a position with which the overwhelming American majority agrees," commented Minuteman Founder Jim Gilchrist. "Bush has been unable to pass his amnesty program through the GOP-controlled Congress, but he won't give up, so why wouldn't he welcome a more compliant Democrat-led pro-illegal alien Congress, where he wouldn't have effective opposition from his own party?"
Today's speech by the President tends to confirm Gilchrist's ruminations. When asked about the prospect of the Democrats cooperating with his amnesty proposals, Bush seemed almost delighted with the change of House leadership. Americans who question the open borders policies of this and previous administrations will have plenty to worry about in the coming months, if Gilchrist's analysis proves accurate.
"This is a devastating blow to the security of the country," said Gilchrist. "Every American is at greater risk than before the elections. Illegal aliens and terrorists are celebrating today, but our mission remains clear: we shall continue our surveillance and reporting operations in a continuing effort to inform and mobilize Americans to demand better border security."
###
SOURCE: MinutemanProject.com
The Minuteman Project
P.O. Box 3944
Laguna Hills, California 92654
MccainAlert
MccainAlert
Thursday, November 09, 2006
would Senator Mccain have lost his senate seat this year?
would Senator Mccain have lost his senate seat this year?
would Senator Mccain have lost his senate seat this year?
It was a close senate race in Arizona this year. I feel if Mccain was up to
re election he would have lost.
Mainly due to his absurd alliance with senator kennedy over border control
/ amensty
oh well, next time.
see more at www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
would Senator Mccain have lost his senate seat this year?
It was a close senate race in Arizona this year. I feel if Mccain was up to
re election he would have lost.
Mainly due to his absurd alliance with senator kennedy over border control
/ amensty
oh well, next time.
see more at www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
what's this Republican Jim Kolbe ,attends the democratic winner party for cd 8
what's this Republican Jim Kolbe ,attends the democratic winner party for cd 8 on Tues Nov 7, 2006.
what's this Republican, retiring Jim Kolbe attends the democratic winner for cd 8.
glad he's out of office.
should be drummed out of the republican party.
MccainAlert.com
what's this Republican, retiring Jim Kolbe attends the democratic winner for cd 8.
glad he's out of office.
should be drummed out of the republican party.
MccainAlert.com
Monday, November 06, 2006
voters angry or disappointed ?
are voters angry or disappointed ? 10/6/2006
November 6th, 2006
are voters angry or disappointed ? 10/6/2006.
I feel that the votes will indicate disappointment in all incumbents.
Please are not happy with the oil/gas problem, Iraq problem and any self serving politican.
Time will tell tommorrow 10/7/2006 election day.
MccainAlert.com
November 6th, 2006
are voters angry or disappointed ? 10/6/2006.
I feel that the votes will indicate disappointment in all incumbents.
Please are not happy with the oil/gas problem, Iraq problem and any self serving politican.
Time will tell tommorrow 10/7/2006 election day.
MccainAlert.com
Friday, November 03, 2006
Rep. Jim Kolbe breaks silence on camping trip inquiry
Rep. Jim Kolbe breaks silence on camping trip inquiry
Kolbe breaks silence on camping trip inquiry
Arizona Congressman Jim Kolbe breaks his silence about the inquiry into a 1996 camping trip.
A trip he took with two former, male pages and others.
The Justice Department opened an inquiry about the Grand Canyon trip after a complaint was filed at the U.S. Attorney's office in Phoenix two weeks ago.
The inquiry was initiated a few weeks after Kolbe's name was brought up in connection with the congressional page scandal, involving former Congressman Mark Foley.
Foley resigned last month after his racy emails to young, male pages surfaced.
A page, concerned about alleged inappropriate emails from Foley, visited Kolbe's office in either 2001 or 2002.
Kolbe claims he never read the emails or knew of their content and referred the matter to the house clerk.
A complaint was given to the Phoenix office but it's not clear if it accused Kolbe of inappropriate behavior on the Grand Canyon trip.
For weeks, Kolbe has been out of the country and speaking only through his office until Wednesday.
Congressman Kolbe spoke very briefly to the media Wednesday about the inquiry but his message was clear, "I didn't do anything wrong."
He said, "I know there are a number of inquiries that are underway and we are cooperating fully with all those inquiries and I'm sure at the end of the time it will show that we've acted appropriately and did the exactly right thing."
The justice department is looking into a complaint about a 1996 camping trip Congressman Kolbe took with two 17 year old boys, both former pages, along with his sister, staff members, and park employees.
There are conflicting details about what went on.
NBC news interviewed a source who claimed to be "uncomfortable" with Kolbe's attention to one of the pages. The page in question told NBC he didn't want to get into the details.
But a park official and the other page say they didn't see anything inappropriate.
Kolbe said, "It's certainly not fun, there's no question about that and we didn't do anything wrong and I'm think that'll be demonstrated at the end."
Kolbe wasn't willing to discuss former colleague Mark Foley, who's under investigation for sending inappropriate emails to pages.
Kolbe said, "It's not appropriate for me to be get into talking about all the individual things nothing inappropriate was done and I'm sure that will be demonstrated in the end."
The House Ethics committee is also looking into the camping trip.
As for Foley, News 4 learned Wednesday that he checked into the Sierra Tucson treatment facility on October 1st.
Kolbe says he wasn't aware that Foley was in town, Tucson, and has no plans to visit him.
see more at
http://kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?s=5591285
MccainAlert.com
Kolbe breaks silence on camping trip inquiry
Arizona Congressman Jim Kolbe breaks his silence about the inquiry into a 1996 camping trip.
A trip he took with two former, male pages and others.
The Justice Department opened an inquiry about the Grand Canyon trip after a complaint was filed at the U.S. Attorney's office in Phoenix two weeks ago.
The inquiry was initiated a few weeks after Kolbe's name was brought up in connection with the congressional page scandal, involving former Congressman Mark Foley.
Foley resigned last month after his racy emails to young, male pages surfaced.
A page, concerned about alleged inappropriate emails from Foley, visited Kolbe's office in either 2001 or 2002.
Kolbe claims he never read the emails or knew of their content and referred the matter to the house clerk.
A complaint was given to the Phoenix office but it's not clear if it accused Kolbe of inappropriate behavior on the Grand Canyon trip.
For weeks, Kolbe has been out of the country and speaking only through his office until Wednesday.
Congressman Kolbe spoke very briefly to the media Wednesday about the inquiry but his message was clear, "I didn't do anything wrong."
He said, "I know there are a number of inquiries that are underway and we are cooperating fully with all those inquiries and I'm sure at the end of the time it will show that we've acted appropriately and did the exactly right thing."
The justice department is looking into a complaint about a 1996 camping trip Congressman Kolbe took with two 17 year old boys, both former pages, along with his sister, staff members, and park employees.
There are conflicting details about what went on.
NBC news interviewed a source who claimed to be "uncomfortable" with Kolbe's attention to one of the pages. The page in question told NBC he didn't want to get into the details.
But a park official and the other page say they didn't see anything inappropriate.
Kolbe said, "It's certainly not fun, there's no question about that and we didn't do anything wrong and I'm think that'll be demonstrated at the end."
Kolbe wasn't willing to discuss former colleague Mark Foley, who's under investigation for sending inappropriate emails to pages.
Kolbe said, "It's not appropriate for me to be get into talking about all the individual things nothing inappropriate was done and I'm sure that will be demonstrated in the end."
The House Ethics committee is also looking into the camping trip.
As for Foley, News 4 learned Wednesday that he checked into the Sierra Tucson treatment facility on October 1st.
Kolbe says he wasn't aware that Foley was in town, Tucson, and has no plans to visit him.
see more at
http://kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?s=5591285
MccainAlert.com
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Senator John "too many paragraphs" Kerry........
Senator John "too many paragraphs" Kerry........
puts his foot in his mouth again.
does he write his own material ?
MccainAlert.com
see more at www.mccainalert.com
puts his foot in his mouth again.
does he write his own material ?
MccainAlert.com
see more at www.mccainalert.com
Friday, October 27, 2006
North American Union to Replace USA?
North American Union to Replace USA?
by Jerome R. Corsi Posted May 19, 2006
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration’s true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled “Building a North American Community” published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration’s actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment “to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security.” The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized. To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that “our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.” Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush’s speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union — not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be “vigilantes,” as he has also said in response to a reporter’s question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won’t do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America’s sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him? see more at………………
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
MccainAlert.com
by Jerome R. Corsi Posted May 19, 2006
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration’s true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled “Building a North American Community” published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration’s actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment “to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security.” The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized. To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that “our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.” Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush’s speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union — not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be “vigilantes,” as he has also said in response to a reporter’s question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won’t do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America’s sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him? see more at………………
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
MccainAlert.com
Monday, October 23, 2006
what the piss?, where is the "Secure Fence Act" ?
what the piss?, where is the "Secure Fence Act" ?
A cheap political stunt may cost more republican votes.
waves of illegals and drugs coming in from Mexico.
People are anxious for this fence in Arizona.
thanks
cc: senator Mccain
Senator Kyl
www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
A cheap political stunt may cost more republican votes.
waves of illegals and drugs coming in from Mexico.
People are anxious for this fence in Arizona.
thanks
cc: senator Mccain
Senator Kyl
www.mccainalert.com
MccainAlert.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)